3 ways banking and finance could blur in 2022

Marion Steward

Fabrizio Burlando is executive vice president of consulting and innovation at Mastercard.

The distinction between the terms banking and finance has never been clear cut. It needn’t be.

Banking services are specific kinds of financial services. Yet even the relatively safe definition of a bank is now evolving.

Take a bank as a licensed deposit-holding institution. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are redefining the notion of a bank account. Definitions of banks as providers of payment services or credit aren’t much help, either. Regulations like the European Union’s Payment Services Directive (PSD) formally shook up the payments space a while ago, and many buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) providers now offer credit in all but name.

Go a little deeper and caveats emerge: CBDCs aren’t typically designed to disintermediate banks. Licenses covering money services businesses don’t compare with bank licenses. And BNPL only covers small short-term loans at or near the point of sale. Still, when it comes to basic perception, banks don’t stand for the same thing anymore.

The shift doesn’t just pertain to traditional banking activities. Last year, open banking increasingly just became banking. That continues to ring true. But it needs a caveat: the banking part was changing, too — and open finance has stolen the limelight. Now, the bank-centric term banking-as-a-service, which fully embraced open banking, is being usurped by the more neutral term embedded finance.

There are three ways banking and finance could further blur in 2022:

CBDCs redefine ‘accounts’

The Bank of England recently announced that a U.K. CBDC wouldn’t be feasible before the second half of the decade. If the U.K.’s position is anything to go by, then CBDCs won’t be ubiquitous any time soon. Yet it also means they are being seriously considered. And caution in some quarters hasn’t stopped the Bahamas, the Eastern Caribbean currency union and Nigeria from already launching CBDCs. Nor has China shied away from extensively trialing its e-CNY, or digital yuan, in preparation for a nationwide rollout.

Specific motivations for CBDCs range from domestic policy issues, such as financial inclusion, to improved international settlements, which are being explored by the Bank for International Settlements in collaboration with several central banks. A common motivation is to modernize cash in a world that grows ever more digital. But unlike the digital representations of cash that sit in bank accounts around the world, CBDCs are replacements for cash that can be held in “accounts” directly guaranteed by central banks.

The general goal isn’t to disintermediate banks. Consensus is emerging around a two-tiered approach where commercial banks act as intermediaries, providing account management and payment initiation services to customers’ CBDC wallet-based accounts on behalf of central banks. Some displacement of funds from traditional bank accounts is likely inevitable. One way to mitigate the impact will be to place limits on individual holdings of CBDCs. For example, in their discussions around the possibility of creating a digital euro, European Central Bank policymakers have suggested capping individual accounts at €3,000.

Open finance is more than open banking with a broader scope

Open finance goes beyond the payment accounts of open banking to include savings accounts, mortgages, pensions, insurance, loans, investments and stocks. But the inclusion of financial services in the scope of open banking regulations doesn’t automatically make for open finance.

Where open banking focuses on whether individual application programming interfaces (APIs) can connect across shared frameworks to provide financial services, open finance takes those financial services and connects them across shared frameworks, too.

Existing request-to-pay services, messaging systems that allow payees to send payment requests to payers irrespective of banking app and with all payment information pre-confirmed, already verge on open finance. Although independent of open banking, they thrive on push payments enabled by the transaction initiation services of open banking. Their shared frameworks combine the same functionality across otherwise independent transactions.

An example of fully fledged open finance is the emerging use in the U.K. of variable recurring payments (VRPs) to sweep money between financial accounts without the need for repeated customer authentication. VRPs take pre-confirmed account details, spanning mortgages to pensions, and automatically sweep money to improve liquidity when predefined triggers, such as meeting a balance threshold, are met. The sweeping is conducted at the behest of customers, who can rescind permission at any time. The growth of super-apps, which provide multiple financial services in one place, will increasingly depend on this unified cross-sector functionality.

BNPL is more than its name suggests

This year, one of the biggest BNPL providers started offering bank accounts to select customers in select locations. It’s a big step, but BNPL providers have been encroaching on banking territory outside of payments for a while. Most obvious is the provision of credit. BNPL providers haven’t been skirting around the issue so much as positioning BNPL differently as a compelling, interest-free alternative. Be that as it may, it remains a form of credit — albeit one provided at or near the point of sale for a relatively small purchase.

Yet BNPL represents more than its name implies. From a certain perspective, those interest-free installments could be considered a form of immediate cash back in a rewards program as consumers receive monetary incentives. And their associated marketplaces with special offers are a new kind of rewards catalog. Those rewards are no longer simple perks, either. Rather, they’re a form of financial management at a time when personal financial management tools are transforming the space through open finance.

The expansion of many BNPL providers beyond their core installment offering partly reflects corporate ambition. But it also often reflects necessity as margins erode in a land grab based on who can sign up the most retailers. A more comfortable alternative involves joining up with open-loop BNPL networks. Without having to build the ecosystem from the ground up, BNPL providers can turn their attention to other matters. As installments become commoditized, the opportunity will be less about the actual payments and more about the financial services that accompany them. Banking license or not, the BNPL space will soon represent much more than simply buying now and paying later.

It’s in those accompanying spaces — be it via CBDCs, open finance or BNPL — where banking is trending through its interaction with financial services. And where banks once overlapped with other financial service providers, there are now relationships instead.

https://www.bankingdive.com/news/3-ways-banking-and-finance-could-blur-in-2022/620568/

Next Post

20 LinkedIn Marketing Strategies to Use in 2022

When you use LinkedIn marketing strategically, you can build your brand and establish long-lasting relationships with your prospects. In addition, by posting engaging content and participating in industry discussions, LinkedIn is an excellent platform for creating brand visibility and nurturing qualified leads. We have included top LinkedIn marketing tips in […]